<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>mrontemp - Latest Comments in Does the Oracle Technology Network encompass too many technologies?</title><link>http://mrontemp.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mrontemp.disqus.com/does_the_oracle_technology_network_encompass_too_many_technologies/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 23:13:53 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Does the Oracle Technology Network encompass too many technologies?</title><link>http://mrontemp.blogspot.com/2008/12/does-oracle-technology-network.html#comment-4140062</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the correction, Justin. I'm wondering how other people have responded to the newsletter change.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ontarioemperor</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 23:13:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does the Oracle Technology Network encompass too many technologies?</title><link>http://mrontemp.blogspot.com/2008/12/does-oracle-technology-network.html#comment-4134175</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The approach is actually horizontal, not vertical (based on roles). Each of these roles has different types of needs, but that doesn't mean that the "complete, open, integrated" message doesn't apply equally to each role.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Justin Kestelyn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:09:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>